CBI reports weaker factory orders as output expectations stabilise

CBI reports weaker factory orders as output expectations stabilise

British manufacturers reported weaker orders despite an improving production outlook. The CBI’s October survey showed a sharp reversal in order books, while expected output moved close to stability and anticipated selling prices increased.


The Confederation of British Industry has reported a sharp deterioration in UK manufacturing order books in October, although producers expect output to stabilise over the next three months. Its latest Industrial Trends Survey recorded a monthly balance of -32 for total orders, down from -9 in September, reversing the improvement seen in the preceding survey.

The quarterly balance for expected output during the next three months improved to -1, compared with -30 in July. That result suggests broadly stable production expectations among respondents, rather than a sustained expansion already taking place. Manufacturers simultaneously reported more pressure to increase domestic selling prices, with the quarterly balance rising to +24 from +11.

The three readings describe different aspects of industrial activity and cover different comparison periods. The orders figure is a monthly assessment of whether order books are above or below normal; the output and selling price expectations are quarterly balances. None represents a percentage change in actual orders, production volumes or prices. In particular, -32 does not mean factories received 32% fewer orders, while +24 is not a forecast of 24% inflation.

The October result contrasts with the September survey, when total orders were reported as below normal to the smallest extent since July 2023. That improvement did not establish a sustained demand recovery. The latest reversal underlines the distinction between a change in manufacturers' assessments at one survey date and a durable increase in purchasing commitments from customers.

Production can remain relatively stable for a period even when the order book weakens. Manufacturers working on existing contracts may continue to fulfil scheduled deliveries, and the time between receiving an order and shipping completed equipment varies considerably by product. Engineering businesses supplying long lead-time capital machinery face different patterns from producers operating with shorter order cycles.

A factory building assemblies against orders booked months earlier may therefore have work available during the next quarter while facing a thinner pipeline beyond it. Businesses serving markets with short delivery cycles can experience a reduction in customer demand more immediately. These are mechanisms that help explain the divergence between orders and expected output, rather than specific findings for individual manufacturers in the October survey.

The selling price balance indicates another pressure on profitability. Manufacturers may seek higher prices to recover expenditure on energy, raw materials, logistics and employment, but the ability to pass those costs on depends on contracts and market competition. Where selling prices are fixed or customers resist increases, a company may absorb a larger share of the expense in its operating margin.

An improvement in expected production therefore does not necessarily translate into improved cash generation or greater confidence to invest. Plants still require spending on maintenance, replacement equipment and process improvement, but a business uncertain about future orders may delay projects whose returns depend on higher throughput. New equipment also requires installation, commissioning and employees capable of maintaining and operating it.

In the September survey, the CBI reported that output volumes had fallen only marginally over the preceding three months and expected a further small decline. The organisation said that 234 manufacturers responded to that survey. The October response count and subsector breakdown were not available in the source material checked for this article, so September's sample should not be presented as October's.

Industrial performance also varies substantially between markets. Demand for aerospace components, food processing equipment, construction materials and consumer goods does not respond identically to interest rates, export conditions or public investment. An aggregate manufacturing balance can consequently change while some producers experience rising order books and others face weakening work pipelines.

CBI senior economist Cameron Martin identified falling orders, labour shortages, persistent costs, weaker competitiveness and fragile business confidence as constraints. His comments accompany a survey showing that manufacturers expect production to stop contracting, but remain reluctant to regard that as a recovery in underlying demand.

Workforce availability can compound the investment problem, especially where specialist engineering skills are needed for new production lines, complex machinery or maintenance. A business can have installed capacity without being able to operate every shift or commission equipment on schedule. The effect is company-specific and cannot be quantified from the headline balances alone.

Official production figures had shown stronger manufacturing output during parts of 2026, another distinction worth preserving. National output statistics measure realised industrial activity, whereas a survey balance measures assessments or intentions. They can diverge temporarily without either necessarily being incorrect.

The October survey leaves manufacturers facing a mixed near-term outlook: expected output is approaching stability, while order books have weakened and more respondents anticipate price increases. Whether production stabilises in practice will depend on how customer orders, costs and investment decisions develop over the final months of the year.


Stories for you


  • Manchester Met details £16m advanced manufacturing innovation facility

    Manchester Met details £16m advanced manufacturing innovation facility

    Manchester Metropolitan has detailed its planned advanced manufacturing innovation facility. The £16 million FUSE-M centre will bring digital twins, simulation, prototypes and industrial expertise together in Hulme, with business programmes planned after construction.


  • Tofoo plans larger Malton factory to double production

    Tofoo plans larger Malton factory to double production

    Tofoo plans a larger Yorkshire factory to double production capacity. The Malton development would increase manufacturing space three and a half times, with completion targeted for autumn 2027 and provision for improved wastewater management.